Astrophysics > Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
[Submitted on 17 May 2024 (v1), last revised 22 May 2024 (this version, v2)]
Title:The SNR of idealised radial velocity signals
View PDF HTML (experimental)Abstract:One of the most basic quantities relevant to planning observations and assessing detection bias is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Remarkably, the SNR of an idealised radial velocity (RV) signal has not been previously derived beyond scaling behaviours and ignoring orbital eccentricity. In this work, we derive the RV SNR for three relevant cases to observers. First, we consider a single mass orbiting a star, revealing the expected result that $\mathrm{SNR}\propto K \sqrt{T}$, where $T$ is the observing window, but an additional dependency on eccentricity and argument of periastron. We show that the RV method is biased towards companions with their semi-major axes aligned to the observer, which is physically intuitive, but also less obviously that the marginalised bias to eccentricity is negligible until one reaches very high eccentricities. Second, we derive the SNR necessary to discriminate eccentric companions from 2:1 resonance circular orbits, although our result is only valid for eccentricities $e\lesssim0.3$. We find that the discriminatory SNR is $(9/8) e^2 (1-e^2)^{-1/2}$ times that of the eccentric planet solution's SNR, and is thus typically an order-of-magnitude less. Finally, we have obtained a semi-empirical expression for the SNR of the idealised Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, revealing the bias with respect to spin-orbit alignment angle. Our formula is valid to within 10% accuracy in 95.45% of the training samples used (for $b\leq0.8$), but larger deviations occur when comparing to different RM models.
Submission history
From: David Kipping [view email][v1] Fri, 17 May 2024 13:34:24 UTC (1,648 KB)
[v2] Wed, 22 May 2024 13:55:21 UTC (1,648 KB)
Current browse context:
astro-ph.EP
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.